software

Getting a Windows refund from Acer in the Netherlands

In September I bought an Acer TravelMate Timeline 8371 notebook. In a following blog post I’ll write about my motivation for buying it and my experiences with it, but this first post will be dedicated to describing the troubles I had to weather to receive a refund for the Windows license. As a Linux user I use Linux as operating system, so I didn’t want to pay for the Windows license which comes bundled with my notebook. Buying another notebook which comes with a Linux distribution pre-installed was not an option, because I specifically wanted the TravelMate Timeline 8371. Not only that is my motivation, but I also hate Microsoft for their business practices, so every opportunity to prevent them from making money is a welcome one.

First I verified that others were successful in getting refund, as a Google search on ‘acer windows refund’ revealed that a Belgian Acer customer received a refund. Belgium is not the Netherlands of course, but it’s close. Even if no one had been successful yet, I would have been prepared to file a lawsuit. Before ordering the notebook I sent an e-mail to Acer to ask if it was possible to get a Windows refund. I received an answer on 14 September, stating that it is not possible ‘because Windows is pre-installed’. Of course the person who wrote this answer is ignoring that the Windows End User License Agreement does give the customer the right to ask for a refund.  I decided to call Acer. The person who received my call initially told me as well that it wasn’t possible, but after insisting that it was possible because I found testimonies on the Internet, he decided to ask a colleague who confirmed that it was possible. He told me that merely € 15 would be refunded though. No worries, it was a matter of principle for me anyway. He told me about the procedure: I shouldn’t unbox the notebook and send it to Acer at my own cost.

After confirming that Acer would grant the request for a refund, I ordered my notebook, which cost me € 531,50. It was sent to me on 18 September. When I received it, I called Acer again for details on the procedure. After being put through three times (!), I finally got someone on the line who was able to help. He told me the procedure was slightly different than I was told before, it wasn’t necessary to keep the notebook unboxed (I did sent it to Acer in it’s unboxed state though, anyway) and I would be refunded € 70 for Windows Vista Business (it’s a TravelMate, a notebook targeted at business customers). All I would have to do is send the notebook along with a form I needed to fill in to request the refund. So far so good, the € 70 instead of € 15 was a lot more reasonable and apparently capable people work at Acer’s helpdesk as well, besides the nitwits who aren’t informed of the procedures.

On 23 September I sent my notebook to Acer, I noticed it was received by Acer the following day according to the the track & trace system of the package delivery company. On 30 September I received a voice mail from Acer, asking where the bill of my purchase of the notebook and the form were. According to the instructions I had to include a copy of the bill with the form to request the refund, which I did. I had placed them in an envelope which I had attached to the package containing the notebook with adhesive tape. So the same day I called back and told a colleague of the person who spoke in my voice mail that the the bill and form were inside the envelope attached to the package containing the notebook. The fact that they had to ask me where they could find it worried me, so on 1 October I called again to verify if they had found it. The person who received my call said it would be investigated and that I would be called back tomorrow. The next day they didn’t call me back. I called again on 6 October, and after being put through I was told again that I would be called back ‘soon’. I began to realize their definition of ‘soon’ is out of touch with reality, and when by the next day I still hadn’t received a call by afternoon I decided to call myself. Without the need to put me through the person who received my call told me they had found the form and bill and that the notebook would be sent back to me again. I had my fears after experiencing the abominable performance of Acer’s helpdesk so far, but after this I thought the whole ordeal would have a happy end after all.

My hopes were premature, as I discovered the hard way on the following day, 8 October. When I saw the package, I noticed the package as well as the envelope had never been opened. All they had done was attach a report of the repair center on the package, stating under ‘Diagnose/Repair details’ that ‘The OS installed without problems, no problems found’. I was totally gobsmacked, dumbstruck, dumbfounded, not knowing whether I should laugh, cry or become enraged. Not only did this pretended ‘diagnose’ have nothing to do with my request for a Windows refund, apparently they thought that if the notebook was never unboxed there wouldn’t be any problem with it. The moron at the repair center didn’t notice the envelope at the package, or more likely they were too rigid in their procedure or too lazy to open it, because I can’t imagine they wouldn’t have noticed it. The moron at the helpdesk lied to me, or possibly misinterpreted the information, when he told the envelope was found. Acer really crossed the line this time, they had already wasted two weeks and too much of my time without being capable to do a simple task.

Back to calling the helpdesk I thought. The first person I got on the line put me through, and I had to select a choice in a spoken menu. After selecting my choice nothing happened, and I was somehow routed back to the main spoken menu which you always get to hear first if you call the helpdesk. Again I tried to get to someone on the line through the usual menu choices to get support for my TravelMate, but this time it was too busy and I had to call back, the recorded voice told me. I called a second time later that day, and I tell the whole story to the other person on the line. After she said she finally understood the problem, I was suddenly disconnected. The only cause of this which I can think of would be that the person on the other end of the line accidentally or deliberately pressed the disconnect button, it wasn’t my Internet connection (I use VoIP telephony). At this moment I was seething with anger, but called for a third time. Fortunately the person who received my call didn’t put me through and easily understood my problem. He told there had been an error in communication, he gave me a new RMA-number and sent me a UPS-label so the notebook would be sent to the repair center again at Acer’s cost. He told me I had to sent the envelope separately instead of attaching it to the package. He put me in the waiting line for a few minutes to finish handling the case, but before he could speak to me again, I was once again rerouted somehow to the main spoken menu. So for the fourth time I called again and told the connection was cut, I was put through again. I asked to which address I should send the letter, and I knew enough.

I called UPS to make an appointment to collect my package and sent the form and bill to Acer. This time they received the package on 14 October, and they sent it back on 15 October if I’m correct. The repair center’s report stated this time that the partitions and license were removed and the system was sent back, as it should be. The following week I was called by Acer again to ask for my bank account number so they could deposit the refund there. A few days after the phone call I still hadn’t seen a transfer of the refund to my bank account, and decided to contact Acer again through e-mail and the phone. My efforts to get the question answered how long it would take for the refund to reach my bank account proved to be fruitless because the helpdesk was clueless and incompetent once more to make a long story short. In the end I decided to be patient, and after waiting some time longer I finally noticed € 70 transferred to my bank account by Acer on 30 October. € 70 on a total price of € 531,50 is 13,2%, quite a notable amount of money.

The moral of the story? If you persevere you win, 1 – 0 for me versus the evil empire called Microsoft. Acer’s helpdesk put me through hell, but fortunately a few people work there who are genuinely interested in helping the customers, besides all the incompetent rotten apples. Don’t misunderstand me, even though Acer’s helpdesk frustrated me to no end I always remained polite during my phone calls, even though I spared no opportunity to blacken Acer’s service in this blog post. Acer should be punished for dealing with it’s customers like this, but if you ask me if I’d buy an Acer product again I’m not sure I’d say no. The TravelMate 8371 simply is a good product for a good price, and in September 2009 the competition didn’t have a product which satisfied my requirements. I don’t want to know how high the telephony costs are for calling Acer’s 0900-number (a number prefix for telephone numbers in the Netherlands which charge an extra fee per minute), probably far too much and a notable share of the € 70 I gained. I’m glad my parents pay the phone bill.

Getting a Windows refund from Acer in the Netherlands Read More »

Why you should not buy an iPhone

In a recent conversation I’ve heard people voice their intention to buy an Apple iPhone. Surely the iPhone hardware and software is well designed and Apple’s marketing is effective, but there’s also a bandwagon effect at work here. People want an iPhone because they see others who use it, and they don’t give much thought to buying competing smartphones, or the iPhone’s restrictions. There are some compelling reasons why you should not buy an iPhone:

  • The iPhone is only available through Apple-approved carriers. Apple uses a SIM lock to enforce it. As you can read on Wikipedia that’s not the case everywhere, but for example you can only get an iPhone in the USA in combination with an AT&T contract, in the Netherlands you’re restricted to T-Mobile. Yes, there are ways to unlock the iPhone, but Apple doesn’t like that of course.
  • Apple doesn’t allow you to use third-party software, you can only use Apple-approved software. Developers who want to create applications for the iPhone need to pay a membership fee for Apple Developer Connection. Developers can decide on a price for their application if they want to distribute it through the App Store, but Apple will take 30% of the sales if it’s not free of charge. Apple can decide to stop distributing applications if it doesn’t like them, as most recently happened in the case of Google Voice. Of course, it’s possible to circumvent this by jail-breaking the iPhone, but Apple thinks that is illegal.

In conclusion, Apple is treading on your freedom. Do you want to buy iPhone and be enslaved by Apple, live with the restrictions, or the trouble to circumvent the restrictions? I certainly don’t. I’m looking forward to the Nokia N900, the successor of the Nokia N810. The N810 was an internet tablet without cellular capability, which made it uninteresting for me, but the N900 will be a full-fledged smartphone. The N900 will run the Maemo Linux-based OS which is mostly free and open source software, like it’s predecessors. It gives you the freedom to install the applications you like, and you can choose the carrier you like. I know Android exists as well, another Linux-based smartphone OS which is mostly free and open source software, but I think it’s flawed, and Google is well on it’s way to the dark side just like Apple. I especially appreciate how Nokia managed to involve the community with application development for Maemo, and I hope the N900 will arrive soon.

But Apple’s anti-competitive practices aren’t limited to the iPhone. Apple has also prevented the Palm Pre smartphone from syncing with iTunes. In the past I used to think that Apple wasn’t evil because of their involvement in free and open source software, especially the WebKit web browser layout engine. But it’s recent behaviour discredits Apple, who have become a second evil empire next to Microsoft with their market dominance of the iPod and the strong position of the iPhone.

If you don’t approve of Apple’s and Google’s actions, there’s only one option: punish them by voting with your wallet, and don’t be seduced by pretty-looking smartphones.

Why you should not buy an iPhone Read More »

Testing the latest web browsers on Ubuntu

Recently Mozilla Firefox version 3.5 was released, but Ubuntu 9.04 a.k.a. Jaunty Jackalope which was released in April still uses Firefox 3.0 because of Ubuntu’s policy to distribute only bug and security fixes after a stable release. Meanwhile, the next release of GNOME will include the first version of Epiphany to use the WebKit layout engine instead of the Gecko layout engine. The Midori web browser is interesting as well, it uses WebKit too but it’s not strictly meant for GNOME, even though it does use the GTK+ toolkit and integrates in GNOME reasonably.

If you’d like to use 3.5 like me, and if you also want to check out how Epiphany and Midori have progressed, there fortunately is an easy way to download and install them on Ubuntu 9.04. You can simply use the Personal Package Archives (PPA’s) of the Ubuntu packagers. Here you can find the PPA for the stable version of Firefox 3.5. When you have enabled the repository and reloaded the software sources, make sure to install the firefox-3.5, firefox-3.5-branding and firefox-3.5-gnome-support packages and the dependencies those packages require. For some reason these Firefox 3.5 packages also depend on the Firefox 3.0 packages in the standard Ubuntu repository, so you can’t get rid of Firefox 3.0. Frequently updated (apparently they are daily builds) development version packages of WebKit, Epiphany and Midori can be found in the WebKit PPA, the Epiphany PPA and the Midori PPA. You need to have the WebKit PPA repository enabled if you want to use Epiphany or Midori. The installation instructions are simple, and can be found by following the ‘Read about installing’ link on the PPA pages. Ubuntu’s PPA’s are awesome for enabling us to get the development versions of software so easily.

When the final version of GNOME 2.28 will be released along with Epiphany 2.28 and they have shipped in October with Ubuntu 9.10, a.k.a. Karmic Koala, I will post a detailed comparison of the three browsers.

Testing the latest web browsers on Ubuntu Read More »

My research papers produced with LaTeX

Recently I have produced two of my research assignments for my History bachelor’s programme with LaTeX. I’ve uploaded both papers along with their sources: Research Seminar 2 paper, Research Seminar 2 paper source and Citizens and Democracy paper, Citizens and Democracy paper source. Both documents are written in the Dutch language, but hopefully anyone who is interested in using LaTeX might learn how to use LaTeX more effectively by looking at the source file and the resulting PDF document. As I expected the learning curve was a bit steep, but at this point I’ve become an experienced user and LaTeX is giving me better results and makes me more productive.

I’ve used some graphics in my documents, they are all vector graphics converted to the PDF format. The tables were created with LaTeX, which can be tricky if they are complex. Unlike what I have seen in the LaTeX files of others, I haven’t used manual line breaks to start new lines, I’ve relied on my text editor to do text wrapping. I don’t understand why anyone would want to insert labour-intensive manual line breaks, can anyone tell me why?

I’ve used the awesome biblatex package for reference management. Without it, it would not have been possible to apply citation styles which are used in the humanities and social sciences. The biblatex package still uses BiBTeX bibliographies as the source for references, but does the formatting of references by itself. The Citizens and Democracy paper uses the APA style, which requires an additional package found here on CTAN. The Research Seminar 2 paper uses a style which is included with the biblatex package, while it does closely resemble the citation style guidelines of my department, it’s not completely similar. I’ll have to figure out how to modify the citation style, which is easier in biblatex when compared to BiBTeX, but still difficult. The Dutch language isn’t supported by biblatex at this moment, but it was easy to make my own translation and I’m in contact with the biblatex developer to get it included by default in a future release.

Both papers use the memoir package, which is also quite useful. For example, it includes functionality for modifying headers without having to use packages like fancyhdr.

Recently I have also been looking into using XeTeX in combination with LaTeX because of the advantages related to using fonts.

Probably the features of LaTeX which I appreciate the most are the automatic hyphenation, the reference management with biblatex and the beautiful PDF documents it can produce.

My research papers produced with LaTeX Read More »

Using the latest version of the memoir package for LaTeX

The research paper I’m currently writing with LaTeX uses the memoir document class, because it provides a lot of useful features. Recently I was reading a useful document explaining how to use the page styles in memoir to modify the headers and footers, but unfortunately some source code examples didn’t work. I figured out this was caused by my version of memoir being out of date. The version of memoir I used was provided by the Ubuntu package texlive-latex-recommended and was dated 2007/01/22, while the most recent version of memoir found here was last updated on 2009/02/06.

The process to use the latest version was easy, but the instructions on manually installing LaTeX packages on the Ubuntu Wiki and the instructions given in memoir’s README file were slightly misleading. All you need to do is create a directory named texmf in your home directory, then download the file memoir.tds.zip from memoir’s page on CTAN, and extract the contents of that file to the texmf directory. Then open a terminal and execute the command texhash ~/texmf. If you compile your LaTeX document again, the new version of memoir will be used instead of the old one provided by the Ubuntu package. To verify it, you can insert the \listfiles command in your document, and then check the log file after you’ve compiled your document.

I was surprised to notice that the version of memoir provided by the Ubuntu package is so old, especially because I’m using Ubuntu 9.04 which was released not long ago in April.

Using the latest version of the memoir package for LaTeX Read More »

Testing the Windows 7 release candidate

A few weeks ago on 5 May Microsoft released the release candidate of Windows 7. It’s a free download, so I decided to give it a try. Unfortunately Windows 7, just like the older versions, will brutally overwrite the master boot record (MBR) without asking. This meant I had to restore the GRUB bootloader to the MBR to be able to start Ubuntu again. Fortunately there are very easy instructions available on how that should be done. I’ll write my thoughts about Windows 7 at a later time.

Testing the Windows 7 release candidate Read More »

Using LaTeX for presentations

I’ve written before about using LaTeX instead of OpenOffice.org Writer, but it can also replace OpenOffice.org Impress if you use the latex-beamer package. The separation of content and layout in LaTeX is an even greater advantage if it’s used for presentations, because with latex-beamer it becomes very easy – when the learning curve has been conquered – to quickly produce a presentation which looks great as well. I only need to give presentations for the History programme I study at Utrecht University, and fortunately someone created a theme for my university for the latex-beamer package. Using LaTeX for creating presentations is superior to using OO.org Impress in my opinion.

Using LaTeX for presentations Read More »

Ubuntu 9.04 dropping you to an initramfs shell at startup

After successfully installing the recently released Ubuntu 9.04 a.k.a. Jaunty Jackalope on my own PC, I decided to install it on the families’ PC in my house. On that PC starting Ubuntu didn’t work however, because I got dropped to an initramfs shell after seeing the splash screen for a while. I used the Desktop CD, copied to a USB flash drive. The PC on which I wanted to install 9.04 already had 8.04 running, which didn’t have this problem during it’s installation.

A bit of searching on the Ubuntu forums quickly learned me that I was not the only one being affected by this rather serious bug. There are one, two, three, four, five topics covering the subject, with the last one being created a year ago and spanning 39 pages, because the problem apparently already manifested itself in earlier releases as well. I tried a few solutions mentioned in those topics, but none has worked. Two bug reports are mentioned to be possibly related to the issue, bug #290153 and bug #47768. I’m rather disappointed this bug slipped through Ubuntu’s quality control, but it’s doesn’t come as a surprise to me. Quite a few bug reports I filed after the call to test the Kubuntu 9.04 release candidate still are unanswered at this moment, and so have some of my bug reports filed for previous releases. I hope new CD images will be released once this bug is fixed, at least that it is fixed in the next release, 9.10. It’s annoying, but I’m not in a hurry to install the latest Ubuntu version on our families’ PC anyway.

Ubuntu 9.04 dropping you to an initramfs shell at startup Read More »

So excited by LaTeX

At the start of this month I wrote about trying LaTeX or LyX to see if it suits my requirements better than OpenOffice. Quickly I decided to dump LyX, because it seemed like another abstraction layer which added complexity and that prevented me from being in control, so I started to use LaTeX directly. I think LaTeX is awesome. I was able to learn the basics easily by reading this LaTeX book on Wikibooks. It’s great how presentation and content is separated in LaTeX. While the basics may be easy, it gets more complicated when you want to to customise the layout. So far I didn’t need to do that, because there are different packages (add-ons for LaTeX) with a lot of options to fine tune the layout. To give some examples to illustrate the power of LaTeX, you can divide the document’s text in two columns or make it suitable for double-sided printing by merely adding an option to the document class command in the document preamble. Try doing that in OpenOffice or Microsoft Word. LaTeX can automatically hyphenate the text – also in the Dutch language if the right package is installed – which works great, OpenOffice can’t do that either.

I do have a problem though. BibTeX offers the possibility to automatically generate the bibliography and the literary references. In principle it works great, but at my History department a rare, uncommon style for literary references and bibliographies is used. An example can be seen here. As you can see footnotes are used for literary references, and if a second reference is made it is displayed in a shorter format than the first reference. For this style of referencing literature, I haven’t been able to find a BibTeX style which resembles it exactly. The most similar one I have been able to find is the Chicago Manual of Style BibTeX style, which I found here. You can create your own BibTeX style, but that seems like rocket science to me. I think I’ll have to do the literary references manually. That would suck, but I had to do the same in OpenOffice.

I use the gedit text editor which is included with GNOME to edit LaTeX files, in combination with the LaTeX plugin. In the upcoming Ubuntu 9.04 release a.k.a. Jaunty Jackalope, it has also been packaged under the name gedit-latex-plugin, which makes it easier to install. The plugin gives error messages if you try to compile a PDF document, so I’m using the terminal to issue a pdflatex <name of my document> command to build a PDF document of my LaTeX file. On KDE you could use Kile, and there are BibTeX editors for KDE as well, KBibTeX and Kbib. Unfortunately, none of these three has been ported to KDE 4 yet.

So excited by LaTeX Read More »

Ditching OpenOffice in favor of LyX or LaTeX?

Recently I have been trying to figure out how OpenOffice’s bibliographic reference management works, so I would no longer need to manage references manually. Especially if documents become large with a lot of references, doing it manually can become quite a burden. However, OpenOffice disappoints me again because it’s bibliographic management feature is severely lacks in usability. After I fired up Google to find solutions to a few problems I encountered with the feature, I found this and this forum topic. The conclusion seems to be that OpenOffice’s bibliography features are worthless, and that you’re better off if you use an external application for bibliography management. But I don’t think that makes things more convenient, and I have more gripes with OpenOffice besides bibliography management, so I was thinking of possible alternatives to OpenOffice. This is important to me now, because in the next quarter of my academic year I will be required to conduct research.

Then I found information about LyX, which basically is a graphical user interface which uses LaTeX under the hood. LyX seems to offer an easier way to harness it’s power than using LaTeX directly. I’ve read about LaTeX before, but I thought it was meant for the mathematicians who need to use formulas in their documents, because that is it’s greatest advantage. But apparently it should also be well suited for those who study the humanities as well, because of the appraisal of it’s bibliography management features (achieved by using BibTex) – which is exactly what I’m looking for. Documents produced with LaTeX also look a lot better to the eye than those produced with OpenOffice or Microsoft Word, because of the superior quality of typesetting provided by TeX through LaTeX. On the LyX wiki a lot of information is provided, like document classes (some sort of templates?) for those in the humanities and example theses. I’m going to give LyX a try, and I’ll report my findings here.

Ditching OpenOffice in favor of LyX or LaTeX? Read More »

Scroll to Top